Introduction
As I mentioned in a previous post I had the pleasure to assist to the first Project Management congress organized in Argentina.
In the congress I listened to a speech given by Miguel Bilello who talked about bad or lack of communication during a project. In this post I will try to expose what I learnt of that speech and what are my conclusions around this subject.
The statistics
The CHAOS Report has been published yearly since 1994 by the Standish group and its purpose is to research the reasons for IT project failure in the United States.

The definition of a projects success and failure is defined differently by different people. The Standish defines them as follows:
Success: The project is completed on time and on budget, with all features and functions originally specified.
Challenged: The project is completed and operational, but over budget, late, and with fewer features and functions than initially specified.
Failure: The project is canceled before completion, or never implemented.
We can see in these graphics that we have improved 18% on project success but we are still failing or being challenged a 65% of all the projects. This is a big number. So we should analyze this issue to try to understand why projects are still failing.
You can see more about these reports on http://www.protose.org/_archives/2004/10/software_projec.php
Why do projects fail?
This is a difficult question to be answered, isn’t it?
Well, let’s start with the beginning, identifying factors and causes of projects failures:
-
- Not clear objectives.
- Constant change of requirements.
- Poor project planning.
- PM Naivety: Such as thinking that developers work 100% of the hours they come to the office. They do other stuff such as meetings, read e-mail, etc.
- Setting unreal expectations
- Lack of communication during a project.
Now that we have identified some on the most common issues that affect projects we can try to analyze them.
Factor 5: “Setting unreal expectations” was analyzed in some of my previous posts
In this post I will expose my ideas of the “Lack of communication” using the lessons learnt of the speech given by Miguel and my own experience on projects
Communication components
To analyze the lack of communication we will start by understanding what a communication is and which the are different elements that compose it.
Communication can be defined as a process that allows organisms to exchange information by several methods.

We can say that the basic components of a communication are:
- Sender: Is the person that sends a message, and is in charge of making it reach the destination.
- Receiver: Is the person that receives a message, and is in charge of decodifying it.
- Channel: Is the medium defined for the transmition of the message.
- Noise: Are the external stuff that affect the message. We use this concept to envelope everything else that is not the sender, the receiver or the channel.
Communication failure: System issues
In an ideal world if every component of the communication worked properly and accomplished correctly its function there would be little or none communication issues. The problem appears when we apply these concepts in a real world.
To understand these problems we can figure out the following example:
Let’s suppose that a PM needs to assign an urgent task to a Developer that works in another office. So the PM sends an e-mail to the Dev. Explaining the new task. As he has sent the e-mail, the PM assumes that the message reached the destination and moreover as he has not received any answer, assumes that the Dev. understood the task.
What could happen in this example is that the e-mail never reached the Dev. And so the task was not performed creating an unnecessary trouble to the team.
This is just one of the examples we can give just to show the troubles of not understanding the roles in a communication. This kind of trouble can be enveloped in the “System Communication” category, because it just refers to the system issue (not taking serious the roles during a communication).
To solve this kind of issues we just have to understand our role in the communication: in this case the sender must always assure that the message reached the destination.
Communication failure: Mental models
Now we will go one step further, taking into account that communication is done between people and they have internalized a mental model and they belong to a geographical zone with their own culture.
What do you see here?

Note: This picture was extracted from Miguel’s presentation
For occidental people this picture may illustrate 2 persons in a room with a window, whereas for people who live in Africa it may illustrate 2 persons; 1 carrying a package; and a palm behind them.
Using this example we can say that every person has mental model which is composed by the culture, by his experiences, etc. By this mental model the person see the world and the reality (his reality).
Now is not enough that sender assures that the message reached the destination, he has also to be sure that the message was clearly understood by the receiver.
Communication failure: Requests at projects
Now we will deepen the communication issues by analyzing how requests are done during a project.
Have you ever received an e-mail being asked to do something urgent?
I have. But what is urgent? When should the task be finished?
I think this is one of the most important issues we have in communication during a project: people tend to do vague requests.
To solve this kind of issue I propose the following guideline and rules:
- The content of the message must be clearly defined: What do you need.
- Do not be vague: Use the correct verb (I want instead of I would like).
- Specify the deadline of the request: By when do you need it (do not use urgent as a deadline).
- Specify who must accomplish the request.
Communication failure: Commitments at projects
How many times you committed to perform tasks that you were unable to accomplish?
I did it lots of times digging my own thumb: loosing the trust of my customers.
We should be very careful with the commitments we do because it may hardly damage our image. We should take into account:
- All commitments are free and volunteer.
- We can delegate actions but not responsibilities: we are always responsible for our commitments.
- Our integrity is going to be evaluated.

Note: This picture was extracted from Miguel’s presentation
Commitments are tightly related to the way we manage expectations, so I recommend you to read my post about expectations management
Final conclusion
Project failure is affected by lots of factors and causes. One of them is intrinsic to the way we communicate and the troubles we have doing so. This post tries to expose some of the most common issues that appear during a project when people communicate. By following the written guidelines and proposed solutions we can control and reduce the probability of project failure.
Of course there is a lot more stuff to do, but we have to start with something and why not starting to communicate better messages?